pad

Report 315
Remediatoin & Industrial Services
Table of Contents


[Back to Report 315]


1. INTRODUCTION 7
    1.1 REMEDIATION/INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 7

2. INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 8
    2.1 COMPETITION IN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 10

3. ABATEMENT SERVICES 11
    3.1 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT 12
    3.2 LEAD PAINT ABATEMENT 14
    3.3 RADON ABATEMENT 14
    3.4 TOXIC MOLD 15

4. SITE REMEDIATION MARKETS 18
    4.1 MARKETS FOR SITE REMEDIATION SERVICES 19
    4.2 CURRENT REMEDIATION MARKETS 20
    4.3 SERVICE CATEGORIES OF THE REMEDIATION MARKET 23
    4.4 REMEDIATION MARKET BY COMPETITOR TYPE 24
    4.5 REMEDIATION MARKET BY PROJECT SIZE 25
    4.6 MARKET GROWTH IN SITE REMEDIATION 26
      4.6.1 Historical Growth 26
      4.6.2 Projected Growth 27
    4.7 MARKET CATEGORY REVIEWS 28
      4.7.1 Federal Markets - 2004 Review 28
        DOD & DOE Expand Small Business Contracting 34
        New Resource Management Planning at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 39
        GSA Schedule Contracts Serve as Vehicles for Land-Use Planning and Other Environmental Work 46
      4.7.2 Superfund 48
      4.7.3 RCRA-Related Remediation 50
      4.7.4 Privately Initiated/Non-Regulatory Remediation 51
      4.7.5 Brownfield Market Review - 2004 Update 53
        Evolution Brownfields Redevelopment Market 53
        "Portsfields" Initiative - Federal Port Revitalization Program 57
        "Restoration Development" Author Cunningham Urges Standards For Integrated Development 63
        Traditional Development Funding Sources Turn Their Eyes towards Brownfields 67
        Redevelopment Benefits from Progress in Estimating Damages 70
        Brownfields Funding and Initiatives in 2004 & 2005 74
      4.7.6 Underground Storage Tank Remediation 79
      4.7.7 State Superfund 80
      4.7.8 Department of Defense 81
      4.7.9 Department of Energy 83
        2001 Report: Consolidation Narrows Field of Contractors for DOE Cleanup 88
      4.7.10 Nuclear Demolition & Decommissioning (D&D) 92
        Disposal Cost Changes for D&D 96
      4.7.11 Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Sites 97
      4.7.12 Other Federal Agencies 99

5. REMEDIATION TREND ANALYSIS 101
    5.1 2004 REVIEW 101
    5.2 2003 REVIEW 104
    5.3 2002 REVIEW 112
    5.4 MARKET DRIVERS 116
    5.5 PRICING AND CONTRACTS 117
      5.5.1 Remediation Market Revenue Flow Chart 118
    5.6 INSURANCE MATURES FOR REDEVELOPMENT 120

6. COMPETITIVE FACTORS FOR SUCCESS 122
    6.1 KEY BUYING FACTORS 122
      6.1.1 Differing Buying Factors in Government vs. Commercial Markets 123
    6.2 TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS 124
      6.2.1 Changing Technology Needs 124
      6.2.2 Development Of In Situ Technology 125
      6.2.3 Technology Applications 126
      6.2.4 Soil Remediation Methods 127
      6.2.5 Groundwater Remediation Methods 128
      6.2.6 Site Characterization Methods 129
      6.2.7 Technology Opportunities 129
    6.3 OPERATING AND FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS 130
      6.3.1 Summary of Profitability by Type of Project 131
    6.4 COMPETITION IN SITE REMEDIATION 133
      6.4.1 Competitive Analysis 133
      6.4.2 Top Remediation Firms 135
      6.4.3 Top Remediation Firms in 1992 143
      6.4.4 Top Remediation Companies by Market 144
        US Department of Energy 145
        US Department of Defense 145
        Superfund (EPA & PRP) 146
        State Programs 146
        RCRA 147
        Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) 147
        Private Projects/Brownfields 148

7. PROFILES OF REMEDIATION COMPANIES 2004 148
    7.1 ARCADIS 148
    7.2 RENOVA PARTNERS 151
    7.3 TRC COMPANIES INC. 154
    7.4 LFR LEVINE-FRICKE 157
    7.5 BROWNFIELD PARTNERS 160
    7.6 PANTHER TECHNOLOGIES 164
    7.7 AMEC EARTH & ENVIRONMENTAL 166
    7.8 ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES 169
    7.9 PARAMETRIX 172
    7.10 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 174
    7.11 SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE 177
    7.12 TOLTEST INC. 180
    7.13 SULLIVAN CONSULTING 183
    7.14 FPM REMEDIATIONS 187
    7.15 DURATEK INC. 190
    7.16 S. M. STOLLER 192
    7.17 SMALL ENVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS ACTION COALITION 196
    7.18 AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMPANIES 199

8. PROFILES OF REMEDIATION COMPANIES 2003 203
    8.1 LVI SERVICES 203
    8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. (EQM) 206
    8.3 SLR INTERNATIONAL CORP. 208
    8.4 SUB-SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. (SSWM) 211
    8.5 THE WHITMAN COMPANIES INC. 214
    8.6 WESTON SOLUTIONS INC. 216
    8.7 THE FORRESTER GROUP 219
    8.8 PORTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 221
    8.9 TRC COMPANIES INC. 224
    8.10 PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY (PNNL) 227

9. PROFILES OF REMEDIATION COMPANIES 2001 231
    9.1 CLEAN EARTH 231
    9.2 ERM 234
    9.3 WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL 238
    9.4 AMEC EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL 240
    9.5 CONESTOGA-ROVERS ASSOCIATES 244
    9.6 MCLAREN HART/JONES 245
    9.7 O’BRIEN & GERE 249
    9.8 LANDBANK 252
    9.9 BITTERROOT RESTORATION INC. 255

10. PROFILES OF REMEDIATION COMPANIES 1999 258

    10.1 THERMORETEC 258
    10.2 CLAYTON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 262
    10.3 LOCUS TECHNOLOGIES 269
    10.4 LEXICON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 274
    10.5 ENSAFE 276
    10.6 ROY F. WESTON 279
    10.7 HANDEX ENVIRONMENTAL 281
    10.8 APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES 290

APPENDIX 295

    OPINION SURVEY RESULTS 297
    PROFILES OF EBI'S TOP 70 REMEDIATION COMPANIES 299
    SURVEY FORM 313


Table of Exhibits

EXHIBIT 1-1 REMEDIATION/INDUSTRIAL SERVICES REVENUES ($MIL) 8
EXHIBIT 2-1 INDUSTRIAL SERVICES MARKET, 2003 9
EXHIBIT 2-2 TOP INDUSTRIAL SERVICES FIRMS, 1993 10
EXHIBIT 2-3 TOP INDUSTRIAL SERVICES FIRMS, 1997 11
EXHIBIT 2-4 TOP INDUSTRIAL SERVICES FIRMS, 2002 11
EXHIBIT 3-1 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT REVENUES, 1993 13
EXHIBIT 3-2 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT REVENUES, 1996 13
EXHIBIT 3-3 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT REVENUES, 2002 14
EXHIBIT 4-1 SHARES OF THE U.S. REMEDIATION MARKET, 2003 18
EXHIBIT 4-2 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED GROWTH IN US REMEDIATION MARKET, 1988 - 2010 19
EXHIBIT 4-3 NUMBERS OF SITES TO BE REMEDIATED 20
EXHIBIT 4-4 REMEDIATION MARKET SUBSECTORS BREAKDOWN, 2003 21
EXHIBIT 4-5 U.S. SITE REMEDIATION MARKET, 1993 - 2003 21
EXHIBIT 4-6 PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE REVENUES IN SITE REMEDIATION, 1993 - 2003 22
EXHIBIT 4-7 SITE REMEDIATION MARKET BY CUSTOMER, 2003 22
EXHIBIT 4-8 U.S. SITE REMEDIATION MARKET BY SERVICE TYPE, 2003 23
EXHIBIT 4-9 U.S. SITE REMEDIATION MARKET BY SERVICE TYPE, 1990 - 2003 23
EXHIBIT 4-10 U.S. SITE REMEDIATION MARKET BY COMPETITOR TYPE FROM 1992-2005 25
EXHIBIT 4-11 U.S. SITE REMEDIATION MARKET BY COMPETITOR TYPE, 2003 25
EXHIBIT 4-12 U.S. SITE REMEDIATION MARKET BY PROJECT SIZE, 2003 26
EXHIBIT 4-13 U.S. SITE REMEDIATION MARKET, 2003-2010 27
EXHIBIT 4-14 WERC CONTRACT WINNERS 39
EXHIBIT 4-15 GSA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE SCHEDULES 48
EXHIBIT 4-16 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED GROWTH IN SUPERFUND-RELATED MARKET, 1988 - 2010 50
EXHIBIT 4-17 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED GROWTH IN RCRA-RELATED MARKET, 1988 - 2010 51
EXHIBIT 4-18 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED GROWTH IN PRIVATE/NON-REGULATORY REMEDIATION MARKET, 1988 - 2010 52
EXHIBIT 4-19 OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL KEY PROGRAMS, 2004 - 2005 77
EXHIBIT 4-20 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED GROWTH IN UST REMEDIATION MARKET, 1988 - 2010 80
EXHIBIT 4-21 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED GROWTH IN STATE SUPERFUND MARKET, 1988 - 2010 81
EXHIBIT 4-22 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REMEDIATION SPENDING BY SERVICE, 1995-2005 82
EXHIBIT 4-23 TOP TEN DOD CLEAN-UP FACILITIES, 1995’S "$100 MILLION CLUB" 83
EXHIBIT 4-24 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED GROWTH IN DOD MARKET, 1988 - 2010 83
EXHIBIT 4-25 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED GROWTH IN DOE MARKET, 1988 - 2010 85
EXHIBIT 4-26 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BUDGET 87
EXHIBIT 4-27 MAJOR DOE-EM CONTRACTS 88
EXHIBIT 4-28 DOE WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTORS, 2001 88
EXHIBIT 4-29 THE CHANGING DOE CONTRACTOR BASE: THE 1970S & 1980S VERSUS 2000 90
EXHIBIT 4-30 SCHEDULED AND PROJECTED D&D OF COMMERCIAL REACTORS 97
EXHIBIT 4-31 CIVILIAN FEDERAL AGENCIES 100
EXHIBIT 5-1 SUPERFUND ACCOMPLISHMENTS THROUGH FY 2002 105
EXHIBIT 5-2 REVENUE FLOW CHART OF THE U.S. REMEDIATION MARKET 119
EXHIBIT 6-1 THE CHANGING IMPORTANCE OF KEY BUYING FACTORS OF REMEDIATION SERVICES 122
EXHIBIT 6-2 SOIL REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY TRENDS, 1992 - 2004 128
EXHIBIT 6-3 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY TRENDS, 1992 - 2004 129
EXHIBIT 6-4 SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGY TRENDS, 1992 - 2004 129
EXHIBIT 6-5 PROFITABILITY BY PROJECT TYPE 131
EXHIBIT 6-6 PERSONNEL ALLOCATION 133
EXHIBIT 6-7 PERSONNEL ALLOCATION AMONG REMEDIATION CONTRATORS 133
EXHIBIT 6-8 GROWTH OF COMPETITOR TYPES IN SITE REMEDIATION MARKETS FROM 1988 - 2003 135
EXHIBIT 6-9 GROWTH OF COMPETITOR TYPES IN SITE REMEDIATION MARKETS FROM 1988 - 2005 135
EXHIBIT 6-10 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 2003 136
EXHIBIT 6-11 DISTRIBUTION OF REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 2003 137
EXHIBIT 6-12 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 2001 138
EXHIBIT 6-13 DISTRIBUTION OF REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 2001 139
EXHIBIT 6-14 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 1999 & 2000 140
EXHIBIT 6-15 DISTRIBUTION OF REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 1999 140
EXHIBIT 6-16 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 1996 & 1997 141
EXHIBIT 6-17 DISTRIBUTION OF REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 1997 141
EXHIBIT 6-18 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 1994 141
EXHIBIT 6-19 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES, 1992 143
EXHIBIT 6-20 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES IN US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MARKET, 2003 145
EXHIBIT 6-21 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES IN US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MARKET, 2003 145
EXHIBIT 6-22 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES IN SUPERFUND MARKET, 2003 146
EXHIBIT 6-23 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES IN STATE PROGRAMS MARKET, 2003 146
EXHIBIT 6-24 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES IN RCRA MARKET, 2003 147
EXHIBIT 6-25 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES IN UST MARKET, 2003 147
EXHIBIT 6-26 TOP REMEDIATION COMPANIES IN PRIVATE/BROWNFIELDS MARKET, 2003 148
EXHIBIT 7-1 SEBAC ACCOMPLISHMENTS 199

 
[Back to Report 315]







[Home] [EBJ] [Reports] [Data] [Info by Segments] [Surveys] [Links]




Copyright © ZweigWhite Information Services
One Apple Hill Drive, Suite 2, Natick, MA 01760 USA
Phone: 1-800-466-6275 | Fax: 1-800-842-1560 | Web Site: www.environmentalbusinessjournal.com | Email EBJ

All rights reserved. This website, or any part, may not be duplicated, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form without prior written permission of the publisher. Unauthorized use of this information is illegal. Disclaimer: Although ZweigWhite has made every effort to be accurate errors may appear and are unintentional.